Last Revision — April 19, 2022
2 Min Read
---
Obfuscators
Names
Within a Class
- Complicated Boolean Expression (family)
- Clever Code (caused)
- "What" Comments (causes)
Marcel Jerzyk in thesis (2022): "Code Smells: A Comprehensive Online Catalog and Taxonomy"
Two bad things can be done that I would refer to as Complicated Regex Expression. First and foremost, we should avoid the unnecessary use of Regular Expressions for simple tasks. Regex falls into the same pitfall as Complicated Boolean Expressions, only that the human population it affects is much larger - there are more people who will quickly catch the meaning behind Boolean logic, but far fewer can read through a Regex as if it were a book. If it is not necessary, or in "measurable words", if the set of code that can validate a string will take more time to be understood by others than its equivalent made with regular expressions, it should be avoided.
The second thing is that we would like to have explainable things possibly at all levels of abstraction. This means that it is preferable to have an adequately named class with appropriately named methods, and thus also long strings interpolated with appropriately named variables. The regular expression should not be an exception to the rule. This slight change comes with increased understandability, although potentially sacrificing the possibility of copy-pasting the regex into one of the online tools for regex decompositions. Developers can mitigate this by adding the "compiled" regex output in a comment or docstring (but then it has to be kept updated along with the method, which is smelly). Some works go into this topic in-depth and test the comprehension of regular expressions [1].
We also have to consider that there are significant, lengthy regular expressions that can be found and copy-pasted from the Internet after a quick search. When it comes down to this one most upvoted answer that has nothing but the regex itself presented by a mystical yet classy username Stack Overflow account without much comment on it. This was, of course, a joke, but there are common, predefined, and work-tested regex for various things like emails that, even though obscure, should work just fine as they are. Getting a standardized and verified regular expression is okay. However, if one has the urge to create his own for his particular needs, then the developer should take care to break it down nicely, so any other developer does not need to debug a collection of squeezed characters.
It's easier to read declarative words than to compute logic statements.
regex_pattern = '(\W|^)(\w*)\s-\s[0-9]?[0-9]:[0-9][0-9]'
def get_regex_pattern_current_city_time() -> str:
"""
Example Match:
- `Wroclaw - 17:42`
- `Berlin - 17:42`
- `San Jose - 10:42`
Compiled: (\W|^)(\w*)\s-\s[0-9]?[0-9]:[0-9][0-9]
"""
prevent_excessive_match = '(\W|^)'
city = '(\w*)'
indication = '\s-\s'
hour = '[0-9]?[0-9]'
minute = '[0-9][0-9]'
time = f'{hour}:{minute}'
return f"{prevent_excessive_match}{city}{indication}{time}"